just keep coming around
Mar. 18th, 2010 02:10 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
so A. and i watched that new milo v movie, which was apparently uploaded on every site ever by someone but doesn't exist in torrents yet? weird. ANYWAY.

informal poll time:
the above scene:
a) made that whole two hours of my time worth it
b) gave me a girl boner
c) i feel your glee towards such gratuitous violence is inappropriate
d) i enjoyed the movie in fact. why are you so judgmental?
e) it's because you don't like milo v isn't it?
f) ISN'T IT?
how hard was rick?
a) really hard
b) really really hard
c) not as hard as peter with sylar/nathan
d) needs more nailgun
e) nathan :(
but what did you think of the movie, REALLY?
a) better than pathology at least?
b) but pathology had boobies and milo's butt and his naked chest. this had none of that. downgrade!
c) a scathing, brilliant critique of the american/corporate dream. i will let you know my thoughts in the comments!
d) PANTS
e) milo looks really good in v-necks
f) i really wish they hadn't hired someone over six feet tall to play opposite him though
g) i enjoyed the dog and the cat. best characters ever!
h) i would really like to watch a movie in which milo does nothing but cuddle with kittens and sweet-talk to them
i) could have been better, but i didn't hate it
j) would you stop it with this fake-poll already you're up to J for god's sake
also, why is everyone moving to dreamwidth? should we move to dreamwidth? our dreamwidth journal is here, by the way. we have not updated it since importing our lj over there that one time many many months ago, uh.
cm
informal poll time:
the above scene:
a) made that whole two hours of my time worth it
b) gave me a girl boner
c) i feel your glee towards such gratuitous violence is inappropriate
d) i enjoyed the movie in fact. why are you so judgmental?
e) it's because you don't like milo v isn't it?
f) ISN'T IT?
how hard was rick?
a) really hard
b) really really hard
c) not as hard as peter with sylar/nathan
d) needs more nailgun
e) nathan :(
but what did you think of the movie, REALLY?
a) better than pathology at least?
b) but pathology had boobies and milo's butt and his naked chest. this had none of that. downgrade!
c) a scathing, brilliant critique of the american/corporate dream. i will let you know my thoughts in the comments!
d) PANTS
e) milo looks really good in v-necks
f) i really wish they hadn't hired someone over six feet tall to play opposite him though
g) i enjoyed the dog and the cat. best characters ever!
h) i would really like to watch a movie in which milo does nothing but cuddle with kittens and sweet-talk to them
i) could have been better, but i didn't hate it
j) would you stop it with this fake-poll already you're up to J for god's sake
also, why is everyone moving to dreamwidth? should we move to dreamwidth? our dreamwidth journal is here, by the way. we have not updated it since importing our lj over there that one time many many months ago, uh.
cm
no subject
Date: 2010-03-18 06:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-18 07:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-18 07:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-18 08:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-18 07:06 am (UTC)also, the last couple of days, when every time i've looked at LJ, they've made some minor change that annoys me, i've totally been wishing i were moving to dreamwidth. but in practice i'm exactly where you guys are (i.e. imported once, haven't updated or otherwise much used since). because i'm lazy. and because everyone else is either here or crossposting. but. um. maybe there's a snowball effect? there probably is. (i don't know what that means, re: should people move, though.)
no subject
Date: 2010-03-18 07:39 am (UTC)oh god really right? the new buttons, and then like, the links that i use to access my friendslist all of a sudden switched around and i was like "...what on earth is going on here?" and for a while there there was a ridiculous link called "my stuff" like WHAT ARE WE, TWELVE? ahem ahem i have issues.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-18 07:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-18 07:40 am (UTC)i'm sorry about the poll! um, i am overly judgmental hi.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-18 08:19 am (UTC)Oh god, don't apologise! It's your lj dude. I'm just laughing at myself because I haven't even seen it yet and might not like it either, and *still* my instinct is to defend him. The things I'll do for that face! And if you're overly judgmental then I'm overly sensitive. Although I do worry about you - re qu 1, options e and f: why do you keep doing this to yourself if you dislike him so much? You'll get an ulcer! *feeds you antacids*
no subject
Date: 2010-03-18 08:29 am (UTC)aww, i don't dislike him, dude. i know i come off as a big meanie sometimes but like, i barely know the dude and i don't even read many interviews and stuff so hey, he could be the nicest guy in the world! (ahh i feel as if i've said this before! but i really mostly don't! i see him as like, a little RPF doll i can play with and you know, dickish behavior isn't necessarily a turn off for me, i was in the interpol fandom for years, and everyone can tell you at least half the band is entirely made out of dicks, and those were the ones in my otp!) i mean no i wish i'd liked the movie i was actually looking forward to it a lot? and i probably liked it more than i would have if milo wasn't in it so there's that.)
no subject
Date: 2010-03-18 08:40 am (UTC)No, no, it's okay! You're completely allowed to be mean - I was just worried about your mental health! And you have, and you're right, and wow, are interpol dicks? I had no idea. Huh.
(which ones were your otp?/nosy)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-03-18 08:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-18 08:42 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-03-18 08:57 am (UTC)I'm surprised about the tiny feet. Although I guess Milo in general is kind of petite.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-03-18 07:35 am (UTC)But did I miss something? I thought the whole migrating thing to Dreamwidth happened last year (or the year before that?)? Has something happened recently that inspired a new movement?
no subject
Date: 2010-03-18 07:43 am (UTC)i think that there have been a lot of lj fails recently? with some sort of like, auto switching links to sponsored sites and stuff like the new buttons and such. three people on my friendslist switched over in the past day or so, which got me wondering? but we're most likely not going anywhere, all our friends are here! *clings*
no subject
Date: 2010-03-18 08:15 am (UTC)Ahh, I noticed the new ugly buttons yesterday but I haven't seen the other changes yet. There have been so many "Let's leave LJ and move to xy" movements over the past years but none my friends really went and the alternatives were never that appealing, so I'm here to stay as well. :) *clings back*
no subject
Date: 2010-03-18 08:33 am (UTC)i want to tell him to get better friends
or at least more attractive onesbut you know. and i don't know it makes me sad like, peter's a great character hey why you gotta hate him so much, milo!i think the only time i've seen people actually moving is dreamwidth? but they cross-post so i guess it's not entirely leaving, just uh, moving house and constantly providing updates to the old address. idk maybe one day lj will fail SO BAD everyone will have to leave, meep.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-18 09:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-18 09:18 am (UTC)we're really lazy, honest!
no subject
Date: 2010-03-18 09:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-18 09:31 am (UTC)*slouches around, slothlike*
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-03-18 06:54 pm (UTC)h) i would really like to watch a movie in which milo does nothing but cuddle with kittens and sweet-talk to them
This! I vote this! Especially in light of the apparent lack of compensatory nakedness. Oh Milo, hon, stop trying to prove your masculinity. It's okay! We get it! You are a very tough little guy! Now get on with the kitten-cuddling, okay?
I dunno, I don't really care whether he's kitten-cuddling or committing gratuitous acts of violence. I just wish I felt like he was picking projects based on actual quality, rather than just on the parts being the anti-Peter and him trying to ~prove~ something, which is (fairly or not) a bit what it feels like.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-18 07:02 pm (UTC)really, honestly omg that is NOT a way to build any kind of movie career. perhaps all the scripts he gets are peter-like characters, which happens i guess when you're so famous as Peter Petrelli, but there's a line between intensely-feeling-Peter and ultimate douchebag. the only thing i think he's been in recently where he's not an asshole is Armored? and in Armored he spends most of his screen-time gut shot and screaming. that is...not a role.)
(also hey, welcome back! \o/)
no subject
Date: 2010-03-18 08:50 pm (UTC)there's a line between intensely-feeling-Peter and ultimate douchebag.
Hee, yes. I mean, I honestly can understand wanting to show people you can do something completely different, and whilst I'm a bit cynical about the precise reasons for that (no, really *g*) I don't think it's entirely a bad thing. But the way he's gone about it, it just...feels a bit like he's trying too hard. Hopefully he will learn to find a happy medium?
(Thank you! Glad to be back ;)