just keep coming around
Mar. 18th, 2010 02:10 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
so A. and i watched that new milo v movie, which was apparently uploaded on every site ever by someone but doesn't exist in torrents yet? weird. ANYWAY.

informal poll time:
the above scene:
a) made that whole two hours of my time worth it
b) gave me a girl boner
c) i feel your glee towards such gratuitous violence is inappropriate
d) i enjoyed the movie in fact. why are you so judgmental?
e) it's because you don't like milo v isn't it?
f) ISN'T IT?
how hard was rick?
a) really hard
b) really really hard
c) not as hard as peter with sylar/nathan
d) needs more nailgun
e) nathan :(
but what did you think of the movie, REALLY?
a) better than pathology at least?
b) but pathology had boobies and milo's butt and his naked chest. this had none of that. downgrade!
c) a scathing, brilliant critique of the american/corporate dream. i will let you know my thoughts in the comments!
d) PANTS
e) milo looks really good in v-necks
f) i really wish they hadn't hired someone over six feet tall to play opposite him though
g) i enjoyed the dog and the cat. best characters ever!
h) i would really like to watch a movie in which milo does nothing but cuddle with kittens and sweet-talk to them
i) could have been better, but i didn't hate it
j) would you stop it with this fake-poll already you're up to J for god's sake
also, why is everyone moving to dreamwidth? should we move to dreamwidth? our dreamwidth journal is here, by the way. we have not updated it since importing our lj over there that one time many many months ago, uh.
cm
informal poll time:
the above scene:
a) made that whole two hours of my time worth it
b) gave me a girl boner
c) i feel your glee towards such gratuitous violence is inappropriate
d) i enjoyed the movie in fact. why are you so judgmental?
e) it's because you don't like milo v isn't it?
f) ISN'T IT?
how hard was rick?
a) really hard
b) really really hard
c) not as hard as peter with sylar/nathan
d) needs more nailgun
e) nathan :(
but what did you think of the movie, REALLY?
a) better than pathology at least?
b) but pathology had boobies and milo's butt and his naked chest. this had none of that. downgrade!
c) a scathing, brilliant critique of the american/corporate dream. i will let you know my thoughts in the comments!
d) PANTS
e) milo looks really good in v-necks
f) i really wish they hadn't hired someone over six feet tall to play opposite him though
g) i enjoyed the dog and the cat. best characters ever!
h) i would really like to watch a movie in which milo does nothing but cuddle with kittens and sweet-talk to them
i) could have been better, but i didn't hate it
j) would you stop it with this fake-poll already you're up to J for god's sake
also, why is everyone moving to dreamwidth? should we move to dreamwidth? our dreamwidth journal is here, by the way. we have not updated it since importing our lj over there that one time many many months ago, uh.
cm
no subject
Date: 2010-03-18 06:54 pm (UTC)h) i would really like to watch a movie in which milo does nothing but cuddle with kittens and sweet-talk to them
This! I vote this! Especially in light of the apparent lack of compensatory nakedness. Oh Milo, hon, stop trying to prove your masculinity. It's okay! We get it! You are a very tough little guy! Now get on with the kitten-cuddling, okay?
I dunno, I don't really care whether he's kitten-cuddling or committing gratuitous acts of violence. I just wish I felt like he was picking projects based on actual quality, rather than just on the parts being the anti-Peter and him trying to ~prove~ something, which is (fairly or not) a bit what it feels like.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-18 07:02 pm (UTC)really, honestly omg that is NOT a way to build any kind of movie career. perhaps all the scripts he gets are peter-like characters, which happens i guess when you're so famous as Peter Petrelli, but there's a line between intensely-feeling-Peter and ultimate douchebag. the only thing i think he's been in recently where he's not an asshole is Armored? and in Armored he spends most of his screen-time gut shot and screaming. that is...not a role.)
(also hey, welcome back! \o/)
no subject
Date: 2010-03-18 08:50 pm (UTC)there's a line between intensely-feeling-Peter and ultimate douchebag.
Hee, yes. I mean, I honestly can understand wanting to show people you can do something completely different, and whilst I'm a bit cynical about the precise reasons for that (no, really *g*) I don't think it's entirely a bad thing. But the way he's gone about it, it just...feels a bit like he's trying too hard. Hopefully he will learn to find a happy medium?
(Thank you! Glad to be back ;)